ETUDE COMPARATIVE ENTRE BETON ORDINAIRE ET BETON FIBRE : REVIEW
En cours de chargement...
Date
Nom de la revue
ISSN de la revue
Titre du volume
Éditeur
Résumé
This Master’s thesis presents a comprehensive and critical comparative review
between ordinary concrete (OC) and fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC), two fundamental
materials in modern civil engineering. The main objective is to analyze the impact of
incorporating various types of fibers on the physical, mechanical, and rheological
properties of the cementitious matrix. Although ordinary concrete exhibits high
compressive strength, its intrinsic limitations, such as low tensile strength and high
brittleness prone to crack propagation, restrict its performance. In Algeria, the application
of OC is strictly governed by national building codes including CBA 93, RPA 99 (Version
2003), and BAEL 91. The addition of fibers—whether metallic (steel, amorphous alloys),
synthetic (polypropylene, PVA, carbon), or natural (sisal, jute)—represents a major
advancement by acting as stress-transfer bridges within the material’s microstructure.
Through a structured methodological approach analyzing 25 recent scientific papers
(published in 2026 in top-tier international journals such as Elsevier and RILEM), this
work demonstrates that carbon and steel fibers yield the most significant improvements in
elastic modulus and tensile strength. Conversely, synthetic micro-fibers primarily optimize
early-age crack control and post-cracking ductility. However, the inclusion of fibers
systematically reduces fresh concrete workability, demanding the vital use of
superplasticizers to achieve adequate compaction. Ultimately, this study provides clear
technical and economic recommendations for the design of durable and seismic-resistant
structures in Algeria.
