سلوك المستثمر في أسواق المال العربي – محاولة نمذجة
En cours de chargement...
Date
Auteurs
Nom de la revue
ISSN de la revue
Titre du volume
Éditeur
University of Ain Temouchent
Résumé
Given the significance and sensitivity of behavioral influences within
financial systems, this study investigates the econometric impact of
investor behavior and psychological biases on asset pricing efficiency
across three prominent Arab financial markets (Saudi Arabia, Abu
Dhabi, and Qatar) from 2010 to 2024. Methodologically, the research
traces the paradigm shift from classical normative models—predicated
on absolute rationality—to descriptive behavioral finance frameworks.
It diagnoses the interplay between cognitive biases (such as
overconfidence and representativeness) and emotional biases (such as
loss aversion and herding) in shaping investment decisions and the
subsequent formation of financial bubbles.
Furthermore, the study analyzes the investment environment alongside
the structural and social characteristics of the target markets,
highlighting the role of the Saudi Exchange (TASI) as the largest
regional market, the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange’s (ADX)
correlation with the energy sector, and the Qatar Stock Exchange’s
(QE) sensitivity to institutional stability—features that collectively
facilitate the emergence of irrational behaviors.
Employing DCC-GARCH and N-ARDL models to monitor dynamic
fluctuations, the findings reveal a fundamental divergence; investor
sentiment (SENT) emerged as a pivotal and sole determinant with a
significant positive impact in the long run for the Qatar Stock
Exchange. Conversely, structural variables (such as oil prices and
exchange rates) dominated the long-term equilibria for the Saudi and
Abu Dhabi markets. Furthermore, the results confirm the existence of
asymmetric responses to shocks in the short term across all
investigated markets.
The study concludes that these markets are subject to complex
nonlinear dynamics, rendering inefficiency a structural trait stemming
from psychological biases and limits to arbitrage.
