تعلم القراءة لدى التلاميذ ذوي عسر القراءة دراسة مقارنة بين عسر القراءة السطحي والعميق

Abstract

Study summary: This study aimed to identify the way to read Have students with dyslexia in a comparative study between dyslexia superficial and deep, where we studied the difference between the pupils of the type (superficial and deep) Of disorder in terms of the accuracy of the answer and the time spent in reading, therefore, focused on the premise of the research on the existence of the series of my readers is the most affected have the sample of the study is the phonology, i.e., the type most prevalent in the study sample is dyslexia deep, as we assume the existence of differences between the two species and between the sexes in reading, in addition to common errors linked to the specificity of the Arabic language and the study sample, the importance of this topic, we have allocated the theoretical side of it to the skill of reading both in normal and troubled, The application side in a survey of a sample of 6 students of both sexes and three academic years, the year third, fourth and fifth seed, while the core sample is composed of 73 pupils also of both sexes and levels of study three in a sample poem from the county soil municipal -Tlemcen - has been used in this descriptive, and I think we choose Dysta then we unload the data obtained this using the T scale to study T to study the difference between the two samples are independent and the coefficient of Pearson correlation after the presentation of the results, we interpret and discuss them in light of some previous studies, After statistical analysis for the cases selected show that there is a deficit double in the space you reading any of that track phonology and optical path are both affected, but to varying degrees touch you phonology is the most affected, as revealed Our results also kind of hard reading the most prevalent in the study sample is dyslexia deep, in the comparison between dyslexia, surface and deep it has been shown that there is a difference between the two species in the accuracy and speed of reading by the type of task, and finally the differences between males and females, the proportion of non proliferation was in favour of males at a rate of two-thirds, At last we have detail for common errors in the reading of the individuals of the sample which date back to the peculiarities of the Arabic language.