Étude comparative d'une commande non linéaire par linéarisation entrée sortie et commande robuste par mode glissant d'un moteur asynchrone
En cours de chargement...
Date
Auteurs
Nom de la revue
ISSN de la revue
Titre du volume
Éditeur
Résumé
Controlling electrical machines remains a challenge in modern industrial systems, which
motivated us to choose this topic. This work compares two types of control strategies, in one
hand is the advance control wish is the sliding mode control and in other hand non lineair
control wish is input-output linearization control applied to an induction motor driven by an
inverter. The complete system was modeled and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink. Both
controllers were tested under load conditions, then subjected to a robustness test in which the
rotor resistanceRr and rotor inductance Lr were intentionally increased by 50% from their
nominal values. The results show that the two approaches lead to radically different
performances. Sliding mode control maintained stable behavior regardless of the imposed
parameter variations, while input-output linearization produced significant peaks and
oscillations under the same conditions, confirming its sensitivity to parameter changes. This
behavior is explained by the fact that this controller relies on an accurate model of the system
once that model is no longer valid, performance degrades. In conclusion, when robustness to
uncertainty is a requirement, sliding mode control is the most appropriate choice. Input-output
linearization remains valid when the motor parameters are well known and stable.
