سلطة القاضي الجزائي في تقدير أدلة الإثبات

Abstract

The criminal judge has the freedom to evaluate the evidence in accordance with the principle of personal conviction in the various stages of the case, whether the preliminary investigation or the trial. Through it, the judge has the right, with complete freedom, to scrutinize the evidence of its various types to extract a ruling for deciding the case before him, so that the criminal judge is not asked how his conviction was formed by the evidence. However, it is impossible for the legislator to maintain the freedom granted to the criminal judge to evaluate the evidence and form his conviction about it without restrictions that control it and limit deviation from it, as that discretionary authority has been subjected to oversight of the criminal rulings issued to protect the individual rights and freedoms stipulated in the Constitution.