القرينة الدستورية ودور القاضي الدستوري في حل النزاع الدستوري

Abstract

This study examines the concept of the constitutional presumption and its role in constitutional review, highlighting its significance in the work of the constitutional judge when resolving constitutional disputes. The constitutional presumption is based on the assumption that laws are constitutional until proven otherwise, thereby ensuring legislative stability and maintaining a balance between state powers. The study also explains how the constitutional judge relies on this presumption in interpreting legal texts and settling constitutional disputes in a manner that upholds the supremacy of the Constitution and protects rights and freedoms.