Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/3576
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorبن طواف, كوثر-
dc.contributor.authorبن عامر, عبد الكريم-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T08:34:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-09T08:34:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/3576-
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on shedding light on the effective role played by quantitative methods and multi-criteria analysis in particular, as a pillar for making complex multi-criteria and alternative decisions, as we adopted in our study the problem of arranging the criteria used for selection and comparison between a group of investment projects using a quantitative scientific approach represented in: The topsis and promethee methods are based on the determination of the materiality weight for each CI-CE-DP-DR-TRC-VAN-IP standard and the trade-off between the available proxy.This study concluded by choosing the third project as the best investment project for the corporation, with a net flow rate of 86%en_US
dc.publisherمجلة التكامل الاقتصاديen_US
dc.subjects:multi-criteria analysis, decision-making, evaluation of investment projects, promethee, topsis JEL Classification Cods : C44, H43,D81 ,C53,C89.en_US
dc.titleتقييم المشاريع اﻹستثمارية بتطبيق طريقتي التحليل متعدد المعايير دراسة حالة سونلغازen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluating investment projects by applying the promethee and topsis multicriteria analysis methods- A case study of sonelgaz Ain temouchent-en_US
Appears in Collections:Marchés, Emplois, Législation et Simulation aux Pays Maghrebine



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.