Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/2008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorمعرف, فاطمة-
dc.contributor.authorشريط, بوسيف-
dc.contributor.authorصديق, سهام-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T09:36:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T09:36:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/2008-
dc.description.abstractAll legal systems have allowed the litigant to ask the judge who issued the judgment himself to reconsider his judgment, and to ask the litigant to ask the judge higher than him to convert the file from the first degree to the second degree, and the basis for granting the litigant a chop in the request for review of the first instance judgment returns to the idea of justice itself. Its issuance and the title of the truth, despite its issuance at the level of the judiciary of one degree, and from here aims the principle of litigation on two degrees, it is thus Lak to achieve the justice of judgments and judicial decisions and the application of delivery and correct law and that the guarantee of defense rights and the importance of our subject regarding judicial dualityen_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.subjectالتقاضي على درجتين، االمحكمة الادارية، المحكمة الادارية الاستئناف مجلس الدولةen_US
dc.subjectLitigation at two levels, Administrative Court, Administrative Court of Appeal, Council of Stateen_US
dc.titleمبدأ التقاضي على درجتنين أمام الجهات القضائية الاداريةen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Droit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
مذكرة.pdf4,06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.