Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/1055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorبن طواف, كوثر-
dc.contributor.authorبن عامر, عبد الكريم-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-03T12:45:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-03T12:45:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.univ-temouchent.edu.dz/handle/123456789/1055-
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on shedding light on the effective role played by quantitative methods and multi-criteria analysis in particular, as a pillar for making complex multi-criteria and alternative decisions, as we adopted in our study the problem of arranging the criteria used for selection and comparison between a group of investment projects using a quantitative scientific approach represented in: The topsis and promethee methods are based on the determination of the materiality weight for each CI-CE-DP-DR-TRC-VAN-IP standard and the trade-off between the available proxy.This study concluded by choosing the third project as the best investment project for the corporation, with a net flow rate of 86%en_US
dc.publisherمجلة التكامل الاقتصاديen_US
dc.subjectmulti-criteria analysis, decision-making, evaluation of investment projects, promethee, topsisen_US
dc.titleدراسة حالة سونلغاز عين تموشنت Prometheeو Topsis - تقييم المشاريع الاستثمارية بتطبيق طريقتي التحليل متعدد المعاييرen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluating investment projects by applying the promethee and topsis multicriteria analysis methods- A case study of sonelgaz Ain temouchenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Marchés, Emplois, Législation et Simulation aux Pays Maghrebine



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.